Skip to content

Muntjac Magazine

4th world Anarchists for a magazine as a community resource by us, for us.

  • Magazine
  • Recent Posts
  • Articles
  • Submissions
  • Zines & Merch
  • Anarchism In Sudan Archive
  • About & FAQ
  • Current Issue

Month: November 2024

BARSNYC – What Does Black Anarchism Mean?

Posted on 26/11/2024 - 26/11/2024 by muntjac

BARSNYC – What Does Black Anarchism Mean?

This is lifted from an Instagram post by BARSNYC, we corrected a few typos and added links to the original texts.

[https://www.instagram.com/p/DCzWA0XvtrQ/?img_index=9]

Introduction

Black people throughout the African diaspora have been resisting, rebelling, revolting, and rioting against the systemic anti-black oppression since the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Black anarchism represents a subset of this broader tradition of resistance that continues to carry on the fight for total liberation and honors the struggle of our ancestors.

Zoe Samudzi

“The Funbamentalist”

[https://thefunambulist.net/podcast/a-moment-of-true-decolonization/daily-podcast-09-zoe-samudzi-black-anarchism]

“Black anarchy is chaos, because black life is chaos. Black life is surveilled, and its policed, and it’s destroyed prematurely. And yet, black anarchism is this praxis of understanding what it means to sustain that chaos. And it means mutual aid. and it means, trying to figure out what it means to make a word that is safe for black trans women. For black children. It means trying to figure out how we can think about justice outside of the carceral system, it means transformative justice, even when it doesn’t seem like an answer is ever achievable, and there is no answer.” 

William C. Anderson

“State Reform Isn’t Enough”

[https://autonomies.org/2022/05/william-c-anderson-state-reform-isnt-enough-our-times-demand-black-anarchism/]

“Black anarchism rejects coercive authority and oppressive top-down hierarchies as they exist across the entire political spectrum. It doesn’t pretend that anyone who claims (or has claimed) to be a liberator, speaking on behalf of the masses, cannot commit atrocities. And it recognizes that acknowledging this, rather than denying it, is how stronger movements will grow. Black anarchism means moving away from and transcending all leftists inundated with oversimplified other/or sectarian binaries. We are struggling for something much greater.” 

Marquis Bey

“Anarcho-Blackness” [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/marquis-bey-anarcho-blackness]

“Black feminist anarchism cannot be contained by inclusion into any organization. It has to be a modality, a manner of walking that threatens to undo the city, steal back the body, and break all the windows because that is where anarchy happens. Anarchism that is not Black feminist is not doing anarchic work.” 

Charlie

@charliebanga [https://linktr.ee/CharlieBang]

“Black anarchism means I don’t have to bow down or bend the knee to kings, queens, presidents, politicians, police officers, gods, or deities. I’m not intrested in being subservient, dominated, or controlled by so called masters, rulers, and authority figures. As a black anarchist, I’m more concerned with becoming a permanent inconvenience to those that pose the greatest threat to humanity, the earth, and all that inhabits it. My true goal and desire is to be autonomous, ungovernable, and unwavering in my pursuit to overthrow the state and all unjust hierarchies by any means necessary.” 

Emiko

@freecongonola [https://www.instagram.com/freecongonola]

“Black anarchism to me means taking matters into my own hands. Not only am I an anarchist, but I’m also an educator, and we all know that the US education system is bullshit. My grandfather worked with the panthers to help run the freedom schools in the Bay Area, and that’s what black anarchy looks like to me.” 

Semiyah

@bsg.bookclub [https://www.threads.net/@bsg.bookclub?xmt=AQGzLm-RROc-k3n4QM9qLu7fFroQmRQ5hoK3gtirjvk75AA]

“Black anarchism is a practice that compels me to apply autonomy everywhere in my life. As an artist, it challenges me to create music that is not bound by rules or a formula. As a writer, it requires me to constantly ask the other question, even if its’s uncomfortable. As a member of a collective, it implores me to use my gifts and skills in a way that not only can liberate me, but others as well. Black anarchism gives me no choice but to think beyond the confines of the colonizer’s boxes and define for myself not only who I am, but who I will be and who I must become in order to get free. Black anarchism has shown me that my resistance is a thing of beauty that refuses to be crushed by those that seek comfortability in conforming.” 

Marcela Onyango

@feelthenews [https://www.instagram.com/feelthenews/?hl=en]

“Black anarchism to me means trying to live as freely as possible in a world that was not intended for me to be free while fighting for collective liberation. It means roasting the pigs while using my comedy to constantly tell people we are not free. It means reminding everyone I know that we live in a racial hierarchy that is built on the oppression and exploitation of Black people. This also means that I’m not invited to a lot of parties because nobody wants someone yelling, ‘schools are prisons’ at their parties. But that’s okay. I don’t want to be at a party that pretends that we don’t live in hell, much like I don’t like to live in hell. I want to live in a world free of oppression. A world where we take care of each other and get high together (if we want). Black anarchism means creating fragments of that world today while actively fighting against a white supremacist state that is preventing the birth of that world.” 

Lucy E. Parsons

Lucy Parsons, The Principles of Anarchism (1929) [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/lucy-e-parsons-the-principles-of-anarchism]

“Anarchists know that a long period of education must precede any great fundamental change in society, hence they do not believe in vote-begging, nor political campaigns, but rather in the development of self-thinking individuals.” 

 

Race Today – Affray: A Police Weapon

Posted on 24/11/2024 by muntjac

Race Today, April 1976

[https://archive.org/details/ldpd_15976636_008/page/78/mode/2up] P78

A £25,000 advertising campaign directed at recruiting young blacks into the Metropolitan police force yielded no new recruits. This information formed part of the evidence presented by community relations chief, Commander Marshall, to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Race Relations. It is not simply that young blacks are refusing to join the police force. Commander Marshall states that they are otherwise active::

“Recently, there has been a growth in the tendency for members of London’s West Indian communities to combine against police by interferring with police officers who are effecting the arrest of a black person. . . In the last 12 months, 40 such incidents have been recorded. Each carries a potential for large scale disorder.”’

Nowhere in the Commander’s evidence are we informed of the State’s policy in dealing with these conflicts. He simply describes them as doing nothing “‘to ease the mounting pressures with which operational officers are being burdened.”

The reality is different. Police officers, while through one side of their mouths preach ‘good community relations’, demand, through the other, their pound of flesh.

It was in the summer of 1970 that they introduced the charge of affray as a weapon of retribution and repression. The charge was first used against blacks in the notorious Mangrove 9 case. This is how they proceed. An incident takes place — a clash between police and young blacks — and several young blacks are arrested. Ordinary charges follow, for example, assault, threatening behaviour etc. Meanwhile, another process is set in motion. A senior police officer is placed in charge of the investigation.

He collects statements from police officers and from sympathetic civilian whites found in a door to door search near the scene of the incident. He knows what he is looking for and these statements are peppered with the right terminology. The case papers are then forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions and lands on the desk of a legally qualified civil servant working in that department. Reading through the evidence, the civil servant spots the right terminology and returns indictments of affray. This usually takes a period of five to six weeks after the original incident.

The defendants appear in court on the original charges and one fine morning are confronted with the charges of affray. Briefly, this charge is defined as ‘fighting to the terror of the Queen’s Subjects’, the latter being the terrified civilians who witnessed  the incident behind their window curtains. Affray charges carry limitless terms of imprisonment. Side by side with the introduction of affray as a political charge, the black community evolved a counter strategy — militant and aggressive crossexamination of police officers in the courts, propaganda and mobilisation of the black community outside of the courts. In order to execute the former, the black community had to find or create lawyers.

White lawyers are notorious for defusing the reality of confrontation that pervades these trials. To carry on propaganda and mobilisation campaigns outside the courts we have had to surface our own publications, established journals being either notoriously pro-police or in the pursuit of ‘fairness to both sides’, whatever that means, they fail to grasp the reality of the black experience altogether. In recent cases of affray, as in the Cricklewood and Hornsey trials, a battery of black lawyers were in attendance. Today, both these lawyers and the publications which seek to represent black interests are under attack.

Listen to Commander Marshall in evidence to the Select Committee: “Nevertheless, continual editorial vilification of police and other social agencies, distorted accounts of court proceedings, and repetition and exaggeration of unsubstantiated and one sided complaints of police ‘brutality’, which forms the sterile basis of a number of ethnic newspapers and periodicals, have a cumulative effect on the state of police/black relationships. .

Not charges of affray, mind you.

Black lawyers have not escaped either. In the Hornsey Trial, eight young blacks were charged with affray following clashes with police in North London. The defence briefed 16 barristers, a lead barrister and a junior for each client. The trial judge, Judge Clarke QC, proceeded, before hearing evidence, to interrogate the black lawyers. Only two, he suggested, were qualified to act as leading counsel. Nowhere in the regulations is it stipulated that a barrister must be this or that before he is qualified to lead. Next, Clarke got out the Law List and questioned the barristers about their dates of call and the addresses of their chambers. It seems he was questioning whether they were barristers at all. This became clearer when he cross questioned barrister-at-law, Gary Webb, as to why his name was not on the list. No one could remember, in the history of the law courts, such a humiliating attack on counsel.

It would appear that the struggle for ‘good black/ police relations’ has become so crucial for the police that they and sections of the judiciary are prepared to attack all progressive black institutions to secure it.

DC APOC – Febuary 2009 Graffiti for Black Liberation

Posted on 20/11/2024 by muntjac

https://web.archive.org/web/20100903233846/http://illvox.org/tag/ojore-lutalo/

“Anonymous Communiqué: These actions were carried out in Feburary for the call to action of a Black Liberation “month.” We wanted to commemorate an often forgotten warrior Ojore Lutalo for the actions he carried out in support of the Black Liberation Army. There were several banner drops and other actions around the D.C. Metro area to support Ojore Lutalo, Assata Shakur and the Black Liberation Army. To all radicals and revolutionaries of color the time for action is long overdue. There is no excuse. Take action now. It’s freedom or death. We’ve chosen freedom. What will you choose? – APOC”

 

FRONT INTERNATIONAL DE DECOLONISATION – Il n’est point de hasard, apres la kanaky, la Martinique se revolte [FR/EN]

Posted on 15/11/2024 - 15/11/2024 by muntjac

From: https://azertag.az/fr/

Il n’est point de hasard, après la Kanaky, la Martinique se révolte.

Aux demandes légitimes de ces deux pays, la France, à la dérive démocratique chronique, ne répond que par la répression et la force.

Ces deux territoires sont exsangues économiquement et les seuls profits générés par les activités commerciales sont captés par les colons, caldoches dans le Pacifique et békés dans les Caraïbes, lorsqu’ils ne sont pas détournés pour alimenter les caisses de l’Etat français à travers la TVA.

La cherté de la vie et le mépris des populations locales sont les deux leviers de la colère sociale qui secoue la Martinique. Cette vie chère est la conséquence de l’extrême dépendance alimentaire, du mal développement, des bas revenus et d’une misère coloniale persistante. Elle s’inscrit par ailleurs dans un contexte de spoliation des terres martiniquaises, de justice à deux vitesses, de départ massif des jeunes et de politique de colonisation de peuplement.

C’est l’expression insupportable du système coloniale en Martinique.

Aux premières mobilisations pacifiques, l’État français a, une nouvelle fois, répondu par une violence sans nom, désormais pratique courante des forces de répression.

Le Front International de décolonisation s’insurge contre ces pratiques d’un autre âge qui montrent la déliquescence démocratique d’un état colonial.

Il considère que la solution se trouve dans la mise en œuvre d’une véritable stratégie décoloniale permettant la construction d’un système économique véritablement au service du peuple martiniquais et capable de lui assurer un futur digne.

Nous exigeons le départ de la CRS8 qui n’a rien de républicaine et qui n’assure la sécurité qu’aux tenants du pouvoir et à leurs relais locaux.

Le Front exige une solution démocratique aux problèmes institutionnels de Kanaky et aux problèmes économiques, sociaux et politiques des deux territoires concernés. Cette solution doit être une véritable étape vers l’autodétermination et l’indépendance.

Trans. English via google translate;

“It is no chance, after the Kanaky, Martinique revolts.

To the legitimate demands of these two countries, France, which is chronically democratic drift, responds only with repression and force.

These two territories are economically exaggerated and the only profits generated by commercial activities are captured by settlers, Caldoches in the Pacific and Bekés in the Caribbean, when they are not diverted to supply the French State’s coffers through VAT.

The dearness of life and the contempt of the local populations are the two levers of the social anger that shook Martinique. This expensive life is the result of extreme food dependency, poor development, low incomes and persistent colonial misery. It also takes place against a backdrop of dispossession of Martinican lands, two-speed justice, mass departure of young people and a policy of settlement.

This is the unbearable expression of the colonial system in Martinique.

To the first peaceful mobilizations, the French State once again responded with unnamed violence, which is now common practice of the repressive forces.

The International Decolonization Front is protesting against these old-fashing practices that show the democratic collapse of a colonial state.

He believed that the solution was to be seen in the implementation of a genuine decolonial strategy for the construction of an economic system that was truly at the service of the Martinican people and capable of ensuring a dignified future.

We demand the departure of CRS8 which is by no means a republican and which provides security only to those in power and to their local relays.

The Front requires a democratic solution to the institutional problems of Kanaky and to the economic, social and political problems of the two Territories concerned. This solution must be a real step towards self-determination and independence. ”

 

 

 

Freedom News – Martinique revolt grows, airport invaded

Posted on 14/11/2024 - 14/11/2024 by muntjac
Shoplifted from; https://freedomnews.org.uk/2024/10/11/martinique-revolt-grows-airport-invaded/
World, Oct 11th

France declares curfew as second overseas territory erupts with protests over failing services and high cost of living

~ From Contre Attaque ~

A brand new gendarmerie barracks was completely burned down in Martinique on October 9, and yesterday the island’s airport that was invaded by protesters, preventing planes from landing. At the same time, increasingly violent riots are taking place at night, the police are being pushed back, and radars are being set on fire.

For weeks, a revolt against the high cost of living has been shaking the French overseas territory in the Caribbean. Roadblocks, demonstrations, a McDonald’s fire, a Carrefour invasion… actions are multiplying. The French state has decreed a curfew without managing to stifle the anger.

In the French overseas territory, public services are seriously failing, with regular water and electricity cuts. The population has been poisoned by chlordecone, a pesticide used by the banana industry.

Vital foodstuffs are also unaffordable. Supermarkets sell food two to three times more expensive than in mainland France. It is a few large store owners, often from families of settlers and slave owners, who are getting rich.

Earlier this year, a revolt took place in France’s the Pacific territory of New Caledonia, in which settler violence and the nickel industry played an important role.

French CRS troops were sent as reinforcements to Martinique, a heavily colonial symbol: in 1959, three young schoolchildren were killed in Martinique by the CRS, and the elected officials obtained the departure of these forces. Now they have made their return to violently repress the demonstrations.

This additional provocation has rekindled the revolt in recent days. The announcement of an additional 300 CRS planeloads pushed the movement to take over the airport tarmac.

Through his authoritarianism and his colonial contempt, Macron will have succeeded in inflaming all the overseas territories. In Martinique, the movement is therefore gaining momentum, and so is the repression.

Min 75 – Summary of the Shinmin Prefecture

Posted on 08/11/2024 by muntjac

A short historical summary of the forgotten Korean project known as Shinmin Prefecture and Korean People’s Association in Manchuria. This was a self-governing region of around two million people from 1929 to 1931.

1. Inception

Many Koreans gathered in Manchuria to avoid oppression from the Japanese Empire, following the Japanese colonization of the Korean peninsula, forming their own society there. Kim Jong-jin, inspired by anarchism under Yi Hoe-yeong, aspired to “create a society in which all were equal without privilege and discrimination, free to develop and improve as they pleased”. He believed that in order to achieve a revolutionary movement it was necessary to maintain a long struggle with a detailed plan and robust organization and that Manchuria was an appropriate spot for a base. He divided and surveyed the region before reporting the results to Kim Jwa-jin, suggesting a reformation of the Shinmin prefecture in order to prevent invasion by Marxist-Leninists. His aim was to defeat those who espoused “scientific socialism,” and hold a long struggle against Japanese imperialism.

Meanwhile, in Manchuria, Korean anarchists created an organization called  “Freedom Youth Organization”(FYO, 자유청년회) whose members were working throughout. Kim Jong-jin, along with Yi Dal and Kim Ya-bong, gathered all members and formed “Black Friend League”(BFL, 흑우연맹) focusing on propagating anarchism. More youth organizations converged under the activities of “Black Friend League” and formed “North Manchuria Korean Youth League”(NMKYL, 북만한인청년연맹) which also studied anarchism with a focus on enlightenment of the population. Kim Jong-jin and Yi Eul-gyu subsequently established the Korean Anarchist Federation in Manchuria (재만조선무정부주의자연맹) using “North Manchuria Korean Youth League” as a base.

Meanwhile, nationalists in Manchuria failed to unify the factions of three prefectures, and their innovative congress disbanded without making much progress. As a result of their expropriating resources from the populace while reigning over them, the nationalists were losing support and the populace was leaning towards the Marxist-Leninists. Feeling threatened by this development, the nationalists and anarchists joined forces to create the Korean People’s Association in Manchuria (KPAM; 한족총연합회).

2. Management

“North Manchuria Korean Youth League”, through their Announcement(<선언>), exposed Japanese ambitions to invade Manchuria and made clear of their opposition to political struggle as they were too reformist. They also opposed capitalism and foreign rule and they sought to respect the will of the individual. They established the rule of free association, thus rejecting centralised governance.

The programme of the Korean Anarchist Federation in Manchuria had proposed a society without rulers, advancing free development via mutual aid and free association, work according to one’s ability, and consumumption based on one’s needs. They sought to revolutionize the minds and lives of the peasants and build an ideal society in order to advance the liberation efforts. Their immediate platform was as follows:

1. We strive to reform the lives of Korean-Chinese people and to cultivate their anti-Japanese, anti Marxist-Leninist ideology.

2. We strive to foster the organization of our fellow compatriots through the self-governing cooperative structures to promote the economic/cultural improvement of Korean-Chinese people

3. We strive with all our might for the education of the youth in order to strengthen the anti-Japanese force and the cultural development of young people.

4. We, as one farmer, run our own lives with our own strength through collective labor with the farmer population and, at the same time, focus on the improvement of the lives of farmers and farming methods as well as cultivation of ideologies.

5. We carry a responsibility to research our own affairs and to regularly report self-criticism.

6. We have the obligation of friendly cooperation and common operation with ethnic nationalists on the anti-Japanese liberation front.

According to the rules of the KPAM, its members were comprised of revolutionary Koreans (Article 2). Those living in the region for longer than three months had rights and obligations including donation of funds, enlisting in the military, voting and passive suffrage (Article 19). As its central institution, they installed the representative, executive, conference agencies (Article 6) and military, farming, education, and economy committees (Article 5). The representative agency was the top resolution agency (Article 7) which was held every January by those gathered by the executive agency (Article 13) and the head was picked by the executive agency to chair the meeting (Article 12). The executive agency was composed of between 15–21 members (Article 11) and handled the affairs decided at the meeting (Article 8). Their terms lasted for only one year (Article 18). The conference agency, composed of members from each committee, handled  connections between  committees and PR decided by executives (Article 9).

Each regional division of the KPAM was the agriculture association and therefore served as a regional administration handling matters ranging from executive, judicial, finance, to education, security, picking between 5 and 9 members to carry out each task. They also installed the associations of education and security to handle the matters respectively.

The KPAM sought maintenance of the region in order to cement organizational foundation. Meanwhile, they focused on building elementary (소학교) and middle schools (중등학교). They also built rice mills in order to protect the Korean peasants from the trickery of Chinese merchants.

3. The Fall

The prefecture began to disintegrate following the assassination of Kim Jwa-jin by a 화요파 (“Hwa yo pa”) Communist Party member, Gong Do-jin, when the Marxist-Leninists attempted to dismantle the nationalist organization as the conflict between both factions escalated. KPAM  blamed and executed figures like Kim Bong-hwan and Yi Ju-hong​​​​​​​ which brought further condemnation and more assassination attempts from Marxist-Leninists.

The association moved its headquarters to Jilin and sought to unite the ethnic organizations against the Communist Party once more and subjugate the Marxist-Leninists. They also tried to calm the local population by addressing a range of structural problems. They quickly ran out of funds, however, so were forced to request money during a meeting in Beijing (무정부주의자동양대회). They got the money and planned to use it to rebuild the commune, however, ten members were arrested by the Chinese police who were collaborating with the Japanese embassy. Police immediately confiscated the funds. China-based Korean anarchists quickly gathered around Manchuria to reconvene and rebuild Shinmin efforts.

After gathering, anarchists tried to restructure and enlighten the population once more but their efforts remained in vain for two reasons. There was an internal division in the association and a conflict between nationalists and anarchists. Anarchists soon found themselves rejected from the main positions of the association as the conflict worsened. The nationalists assassinated Yi Jun-geun, Kim Ya-un, and Kim Jong-jin, thus, finally closing the chapter of the Shinmin prefecture as the anarchists fled from Manchuria.

4. Why It Failed

The KPAM did indeed operate in an anarchistic manner. It was structured in accordance with anarchist principles of bottom-up organization, based on free association. Each region would send their share of delegates who would manage the main issues of the association, and the general association would take care of all paperwork, decide on foreign affairs, and public relations. Each region would hold a meeting to choose delegates and write proposals to the main branch. However, due to the situation in Manchuria, the lacking state of the Shinmin prefecture forced the association to adopt a top-down approach whereby they would select a couple of candidates for each structure and hold elections respectively.

However, the KPAM had a fundamental flaw. Whilst it was operated and structured by anarchist principles, it was not unified by anarchism nor did every member agree with anarchism. For example, one phrase of their programme says, “[w]e strive for the complete independence of the nation and thorough liberation of the people”. This meant they did not deny the state but rather that they acknowledged it. Despite the state being one of the top authoritarian oppressors of the people according to anarchists, anarchists in Shinmin deviated from their principles. They recognised the state in order to collaborate with the nationalists because they needed the regional base from them. This “non-anarchistic” element eventually led to  internal divisions within the association, but also between the anarchists and nationalists. Despite nationalist ideology having fundamental differences with anarchism, anarchists cooperated with nationalists. This was a self-contradiction. The anarchists carried a risk by sharing a regional base with the nationalists instead of establishing their own and, unfortunately, this collaboration ultimately led to their defeat.

5. Aftermath

After anarchists fled from Manchuria to mainland China, they resumed their focus on terrorist activities. Unlike in Korea and Japan, there was no Korean populace with whom to rally the movement and because the efforts to build a base for liberation movement were shattered, the only remaining option for Korean anarchists at the time (this being the early- to mid- 1930s) was direct terrorism.
They were heavily discouraged by the failures of Shinmin and having to live abroad, this encouraged them towards nihilist terrorism. The remaining anarchists began collaborating with nationalists like Kim Koo as both groups had a common objective — to achieve liberation through terrorism. Kim Koo and nationalists possessed the funds whilst the anarchists had the people to carry out assassinations. The anarchists also had prior experience of cooperating with nationalists in Shinmin. The anarchists loathed the Marxist-Leninists after they killed Kim Jwa-jin and this was a key factor in the fall of Shinmin, which ultimately led to anti-ML activities.

Source

Dr. Yi Horyong (이호룡), 한국의 아나키즘 – 운동편 (지식산업사, 2015), 332-360.

Further Reading

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/shinmin

 

 

 

Adam K. – Anarchist Orientalism and the Muslim Community in Britain [2007]

Posted on 06/11/2024 - 06/11/2024 by muntjac

Taken from the APOC website; https://web.archive.org/web/20100603234052/http://illvox.org/2007/06/anarchist-orientalism-and-the-muslim-community-in-britain/

Most Muslims in Britain are from South Asia being either Pakistani or Bangladeshi and concentrated in areas such as East London, Slough, Luton and the North of England. Many are also asylum seekers and immigrants from Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans. After September 11th governments have found it easy to justify immigration and asylum laws thereby linking it to terrorism. Many Muslims in both Britain since S11 have also been arrested, interrogated and imprisoned by the authorities under suspected charges of terrorism and with little proof. It seems that the law has decided that all Pakistanis and Arabs are potential terrorists just as they view all Afro-Caribbean people as potential muggers and drug dealers.

This new anti-Muslim racism has also led to an increase in racist attacks and violence; there have been reports in Britain after 9/11 of Muslim women having their hijab (headscarves) forcefully removed in public. In particular there has been racist anti-Muslim violence in East London and also Slough, which is being under-reported. In Slough for example, one week after 9/11 the Pakistani community was subjected to a National Front rally in the town centre and later that night received attacks on Asian homes. It is this situation that led many of the Asian Muslim youth to rise up last summer expressing their frustration with their marginalized situation caused by racism and poverty. It seems that there is a failure in understanding Islam properly and indeed the situation which Muslims face. For example the media has associated many of these frustrated Asian youth with fundamentalist politics and fundamentalist groups such as the exiled Syrian Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammed’s Al Muhajiroun group. Alongside the New Labour government’s demand that immigrants should “integrate” and learn English, one can see clearly that this situation creates an atmosphere of ignorance and blame on these undesirable elements of society. As Mubshir Hussein, a young Pakistani once said to me, “things are really fucked for us at the moment”, but how can anarchists help to make sure that things are not so “fucked”.

The reality reflects that the anarchist movement in Britain is very eurocentric and very white. Its hegemonistic class purist outlook makes it clear that class homogeneity is superior to all other variables in society therefore the existence of any cultural homogeneity goes out of the window and is ignored as being undesirable. The anarchist movement in Britain has an especially ignorant and hegemonistic attitude and perception of the Muslim community, and this is no doubt linked to the eurocentric nature of the movement. The London based Anarchist Federation produced an article in their resistance magazine in December 2001 stating, “Islam is an enemy of all freedom loving people”. Such statements after the tragedy of September 11th are indeed something, which Muslim minorities in the West have had to get used to. The only problem I have with the above quote is that it is no different to the bigoted rhetoric of George Bush or even Nick Giffen the leader of the far right British Nationalist Party which has in recent years focused its attack specifically on Muslims instead of all coloured people. The BNP itself is very active in the North of England and has been standing in local elections with substantial support in areas such as Leeds, Burnley, Oldham and Bradford, in fact it was in these areas that the last summer’s riots occurred with the exception of Leeds. The far right in these areas are much stronger then the left, and have been involved in racist anti-Muslim violence. In Bradford, the BNP is cleverly attempting to divide the Asian community and has been leafleting Hindus and Sikhs about the evils of Islamic fundamentalism in the hope that they would vote for them by attempting to fuel inter-religious hatred. In Bradford also the anarchist movement is quite active but has little connection to the Muslim community and therefore remains dumbfounded as to how to counter the BNP. In addition to the anarchists, the tactics of the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party and the Anti-Nazi League mainly involves plastering posters on walls, giving out leaflets, expanding membership lists and then buggering off into the sunset. This approach is unwise as the South Asian Muslim community in the North of England is in a very marginalized situation and what is needed is a radical anti-racist movement, which organises within the community. The bigotry towards Muslims, their culture, their religion and identity is therefore universal and is reflected in the media, academia, the right and left, they all seem to sing the same chorus using fundamentalist groups such as Al-Muhajiroun, as there example and thereby portraying Muslims as being monolithically reactionary, homophobic and oppressive towards women. If the left, anarchist and anti-capitalist movement claim to be progressive then something is seriously has to be addressed.

I once came across a white anarchist who was extremely ignorant with regards to his perceptions of Muslims. What was disturbing was the fact that he was attacking not only Islam, with the primitive and simplistic knowledge he had of the religion; but also Muslims in general, namely their culture, way of life, beliefs and showed a complete conviction in the media and right wing stereotypes. This was also reflected at a “No War but Class War” meeting, a UK coalition of anarchists against the War on Terror. I seemed to be the only coloured face in the whole room of at least 50 anarchists. The discussion seemed to show an acceptance of Muslims monolithically being fundamentalist, reactionary and oppressive towards women. It is clear that patriarchy, homophobia and conservatism exists in Muslim societies but do not these tendencies also exist in white, European and non-Muslim societies? Patriarchy, homophobia and conservatism are universal because capitalism is universal. With regards to women, the left and the anarchist movement accepts the stereotype of Muslim women who wear the Hijab, as being oppressed and docile creatures. The anarchists have therefore fallen into the trap of believing that Western women are liberated whilst Muslim women are not. Implying that Muslim women are only free if they remove the Hijab and don the mini-skirt is as ridiculous as the Taleban imposing the Hijab (and indeed the Burqa) whilst abolishing the mini-skirt. As the Morrocan Feminist Fatima Mernissi once said “a size 6 is the Western woman’s harem”. A universal patriarchal system is clearly the problem here, not the exclusive evils of a puritan Muslim culture.

One can say that this is an example of Edward Said’s “Orientalism”, thus it is the West who dictates to the Muslim what Islam is despite it’s immense diversity as a culture, religion and way of life. As descendents of an orientalist culture, the British anarchist movement’s phobia of religion is merely an added variable to their extreme eurocentrism, therefore South Asian Muslims are judged in accordance to the concept of modernity and thus they must change in accordance to Western society. It is this pressure, which drives many of the alienated Muslim Asian youth to join groups such as Al-Muhajiroun as a reaction, and yet I have come across anarchists who refer to such people as “twats” which is disturbing as they have no knowledge whatsoever with regards to their experiences. Al-Muhajiroun has won an almost celebrity status in the UK thanks to the media which constantly portrays them as mainstream Islam thereby helping governments in their racist “war on terror”. What is needed is a movement, which not only organises within Muslim and Asian communities, but also presents ideologically progressive alternatives to Al-Muhajiroun thereby reclaiming our identity from the perversions by the media, politicians and white radicals and leftists.

It is clear that the anarchist phobia of religion within the framework of an anti-religious secular culture is indeed another reason to attack Muslims as being reactionary. On April 13th 2002, a pro-Palestine demo mobilised up to 50-100,000 people on the streets of London. What was different about this demo was that it was mainly composed of Muslims, Asians, Arabs and refugees. There was only a small contingent from the usual anti-war leftists, anti-capitalists and an even smaller contingent of anarchists. Some hard left newspapers have referred to the demonstration as being reactionary because it was supposedly composed of hard-core religious elements, this view was also reflected by some anarchists. The reality reflects that the demonstration was most definitely not reactionary rather it was a mobilisation of ordinary people expressing their solidarity with the Palestinian Intifada. It is both racist Islamaphobic and ridiculous to assert such a view. Just because the demonstration was not composed of the usual Trotskyist and anarchist elements, does not mean that it was reactionary.

Religion is a part of many people’s cultures not only in Muslim countries but also for example in Latin America and especially in the indigenous communities. The reality reflects that Islam, Muslim societies and individuals can be both reactionary and progressive thereby reflecting the dialectics of capitalist society. This dichotomy exists in all contexts therefore Anglo-Saxon and European culture can also be both reactionary and progressive with its secular traditions. Thus it is not an issue of being nice to Muslims and Islam, on the contrary it is one of finding an intelligent sociological analysis of society which seeks truth and is based on the reality, namely that we are all human and humans are complicated. Cultural reifications can lead to hegemonism, and the anarchist movement must do away with their hegemonistic application of modernity. Hegemony must be abolished within any anti-capitalist and revolutionary praxis so that people can be free to be what they want to be.

Hadotso – Maroons: Guardians of the flag of liberation

Posted on 03/11/2024 - 28/04/2025 by muntjac

Green Anarchy, #25 P58-61, 2008.

This piece was published in the final issue of Green Anarchy, a magazine that ran from 2000 to 2008, starting as an environmentalist anarchist publication and slowly evolving under new editorship into an anti-civilization anarchist magazine from the 5th issue onwards. It came out two years before Russel “Maroon” Shoatz’s famous article on the Maroons and since this magazine was given to prisoners perhaps it was an influence, but we’ll never know for sure.

The magazine is avalible as a OCR’d PDF here

Maroons: Guardians of the flag of liberation

Wage Slavery

Wage-based economic systems are nothing short of slavery. The plantations have been replaced largely by the industrial-urban centers. Strip-malls and service jobs. Modern techno-industrial society, or the misleading label “post” industrial, is only the most recent manifestation of mass production with gadgets, widgets, and information replacing sugarcane and cotton as the commodity of choice. The master’s bullwhip has been perfectly replaced by the instrument of law. The use of violence, or more overtly the threat of use, keeps the wage-slaves in check thereby transforming spontaneous, creative individuals into diligent worker-bees. The owner’s brand has been replaced by the name brand: the corporate logo. However instead of holding a child down to sear a glowing iron into her shoulder to symbolize ownership, they are chained to assembly lines forcing them to sew on designer labels for 13 hours a day. “The Nike Swoosh is nothing more than a whip in mid-swing.”

One is compelled to work because s/he knows that if s/he doesn’t they will be forcefully removed from their home. They will be unable to buy groceries. And yet those that cringe at the mention of plantation-slavery, no doubt thinking it some relic of a bygone era and not a reality in present-day society, are on their knees, hands outstretched begging to accept the conditions of wage-slavery. But not every slave ran into the burning house to save their master; some ran away, others added fuel. What exactly happened to those who ran away? His-story does not tell us, because in doing so, it would be forced to admit it’s illegitimateness: That while some accepted the terms, others refused. That many resisted and had to be crushed. That civilization is not the natural climax of human evolution it proudly proclaims itself to be. It would be forced to confess it’s biggest fear: That all civilizations fall. Out of fear some slaves voluntarily elected to stay on the plantations. Believing the few scraps thrown at their feet sufficient enough to ‘survive.’ Positing that being given a discarded ceramic plate by the slave-owner demonstrated  an actual improvement of their condition.

Believing that purchasing a luxury SUV confirms an actual improvement of their condition. But by accepting either the dish or the SUV, the slave accepts the circumstances, despite the fact that, in reality, they are contributing to their own demise. Those who stayed on the plantations survived just long enough to work themselves to an early death. Can anyone imagine a group of slaves ever desiring to “collectively-oversee” their own bondage? Why would an individual wish to self-manage the chains of syndicalism’s servitude? Those that did not desire to braid the very rope that was to eventually hang them escaped. Those who ran away survived. They ran into the bushes of Brazil. They ran into the mountains of Venezuela. They ran into the swamps of Carolina. They ran into the forests of Mexico. They ran into the open arms of their Indian brothers and sisters: the natives. Fugitives and Savages. And it was here, among the howling wilderness out of civilization’s reach, that they formed their alliances. Alliances that welcomed all who fought against the colonial megamachine. New tribes were founded. (In America alone, over 200 tri-racial isolate communities existed). New cultures were created. Cultures of resistence.

Injuns, Niggas, and Feral Cattle

The word Maroon is derived from the Spanish Cimarron, which originally referred to domestic cattle that had taken to the hills. Later, it was pejoratively used for Indians who, knowing the terrain better than the Africans, were the earliest to escape. Ultimately, the term became almost exclusively a label for Africans, although Maroon communities consisted of natives, Africans, Europeans, and possibly slaves brought over to the Americas from India and the Middle East among others. Michael Kolhoff gives a brief overview of their connection: …that fugitives would band together for survival isn’t unusual. The runaways would have a common enemy, the colonial governments of the coast and the slave masters of the plantations. The plantation fields of the early colonial period also incorporated a wide diversity of forced labor. There would have been Native Americans of the coastal tribes, kidnaped Africans, Gypsies (who were transported to the “New World” by all the colonial powers), and British and Irish prisoners working out their sentences. It’s not hard to imagine that all the individuals interested in escaping would have been drawn to the Native Americans, who knew the land and had contacts in the wild [Kolhoff]. Describing the historical Maroon in Brazil, Roger Bastide hints at the parallel to our present situation, when he states, “The basic maroon context is the struggle of an exploited group against the ruling class” [Bastide].

Studying the weather patterns and natural cycles of this strange, foreign land, slaves waited weeks, months, even years for the right moment to escape. When they did, they opted to give themselves fully to the wilderness, rather than face another day of enslavement. They abandoned the guarantee of slave quarters, tattered clothes, and measly food choosing the possibility of dying free in the unknown jungle. Will we desert our square apartments, sweatshop denim, and bio-engineered food for even a brief taste of feral freedom? Ethnobotanist Mark Plotkin, who has lived and studied among contemporary descendants of these early Maroons, characterizes the observation a few Slaves undoubtedly made prior to their escape, “Hey, this is Equatorial Rainforest….we’ll see you white boys later!” [Plotkin]. Sometimes the opportunity for slaves to escape arose purely by chance. During the early 16th century the region of Esmeraldas in Ecuador became a Maroon haven by accident when, “Spanish ships carrying slaves from Panama to Guayaquil and Lima were wrecked along the equatorial coast amidst strong currents and shifting sandbars. A number of slave castaways consequently dashed to freedom in the unconquered interior, where they allied with indigenous groups and a handful of Spanish renegades” [Romero].

What opportunity will we take advantage of for our chance to race towards freedom? Slaveships are no longer our carrying vessel, so a shipwreck will present us with little opportunity to be sure. Nevertheless, although ships no longer crash (except when they are transporting oil, then they appear to tip over with alarming frequency), stock markets certainly do. Lines of communication crash. (One of the most effective and certainly one of the easiest forms of resistance among Native Americans was the chopping down of telegraph poles). Information superhighways crash. (12 yr old kids have cost multinational corporations millions of dollars with just a few minutes of hacking). Structures crash. (With a simple shrug of an earthquake entire cities have disappeared). And not just the linear metal and concrete type either, but social structures, too. Networks of importing natural resources crash. (In recent years sporadic blackouts throughout the country have left millions without electricity). Financial institutions crash. Foundations of exploitation crash. Civilizations crash. Who will be the next generation of Maroons when Western Civilization capsizes?

Quilombos: The Original Autonomous Zones 

North America

Fighting between colonial powers oftentimes led to a power vacancy that was exploited by the Maroons in order to establish independent, self-sufficient communities. Three regions in North America stand out for both their longevity and their determination: The Great Dismal Swamp (along the North Carolina and Virginia border), The Neutral Strip (a 500 square mile expanse of impenetrable wilderness among the backwaters of Louisiana), and the Florida Everglades (which were interspersed with villages populated [both separately and together] by Native Americans and Africans). The Great Dismal Swamp and the Neutral Strip were both claimed by competing colonial powers but in the absence of permanently stationed imperial authority, were in actuality governed by neither. The Neutral Strip emerged in 1806 when the American and Spanish governments could not agree on the definite borders. When the British arrived to develop North Carolina as a commercial plantation, “…the Maroons retreated to the depths of the Great Dismal Swamp and from their sanctuary waged a 160-year guerilla war against slavery” [Koehnline]. In the years prior to the Civil War the Great Dismal Swamp also, “became a major stop on the underground railroad….No doubt many of the runaway slaves decided to remain in the swamp. During the war the Great Dismal Swamp was an area that the Confederate forces stayed clear of” [Kolhoff]. Similarly, it is reported that amongst the “swamp and canebrakes (of the Neutral Strip) that many who went in uninvited never came out again” [Kolhoff]. Largely due to their astounding inaccessibility, these three regions were immune to colonial, governmental, and state interference and provided inspiration to those who consequently revolted. The relationship between free slaves and plantation slaves continued to induce leading citizens to complain that their, “….slaves are becoming almost uncontrollable. They go and come when and where they please, and if an attempt is made to correct them they immediately fly into the woods and there continue for months and years committing grievous depredations on our cattle, hogs, and sheep” [Price].

So long as there was only the infrequent runaway, the outlaw villages were small, and raiding of plantations was a rarity, the Great Dismal Swamp could be tolerated, albeit grudgingly. When more and more slaves began to taste freedom however, slave rebellions multiplied, threatening the economic progress of the colonial government. The Maroons of the Great Dismal Swamp could no longer be ignored, eventually leading to, “such a prominent figure as George Washington to recommend its draining and conversion to farmland” [Kolhoff]. Fortunately the task proved too much even for the noble father of this great nation. No form of punishment was ever considered too “cruel and unusual” for recaptured slaves. In July, 1837 a Maroon leader named Squire, whose tribe had lasted over three years conducting raids on plantations and killing slave owners, was tragically killed in the swamps. His body was fished out and exhibited in the public square of New Orleans for several days [Price]. Locals in South Carolina took it a step further when, after a Maroon was captured near Pineville, he was subsequently “….decapitated, and his head stuck on a pole and publicly exposed as ‘a warning to vicious slaves’” [Price]. Despite the occasional death and all governmental attempts to eradicate their settlements, the roving Maroons within these swamps continued to survive, the descendants of which are still there today. In North Carolina, breaking their backs working on farms owned by multinational corporations. In rural towns of Virginia eking out a meager existence as day laborers. They are the Melungeons of North Carolina. The Redbones of Louisiana. The Seminoles of Florida. Beautiful blends of African, European, and Indian features, each with a faint trace of revolution still burning in their eye.

South America

Like their counterparts up north, the Maroon communities that endured in South America were the ones that were the most isolated and the most exhausting to reach. In this respect, South America had a definite advantage in the sheer amount of jungle, mountains, and rainforest. Successful Maroon communities learned quickly to turn the harshness of their immediate surroundings to their own advantage for purposes of concealment and defense. Paths leading to villages were carefully disguised, and much use was made of false trails replete with deadly booby traps. In the Guianas, villages set in the swamps were approachable only by an underwater path, with other false paths carefully mined with pointed spikes or leading only to fatal quagmires or quicksand [Price]. The Maroon villages of the Caribbean and South America were referred to variously as Quilombos (free towns), Palenques (slang for the palisades surrounding most Maroon encampments), or Mocambos (a variation of Mu-kambo which means ‘hideout’ in Ambundu). Unquestionably the largest Quilombo was the triumphant village of Palmares, “a federation of Maroon communities whose population was estimated by contemporary sources, variously, to be 11,000, 16,000, 20, 000, and even 30,000 people” [Reis].

The saga of Palmares are still celebrated today in song and folklore. In addition to Brazil, other countries including Peru, Colombia, Suriname, Venezuela, French Guiana can boast a strong tradition of Maroon havens. In Bolivia “communities of Tupinamba Indians and escaped slaves…existed in Jaguaripe for over forty years” [Schwartz]. In Colombia the community of Sombrerillo numbered over 200 inhabitants including Maroons, free blacks, whites, Mulattos, and Zambos (Afro-Indians) [Romero]. Unlike their fugitive brothers and sisters in North America, who were subject to a full onslaught of Empire demanding acculturation and assimilation, a large number of Central and South American slaves were able to survive thanks to the same challenging terrain that helped them escape. Today along the Amazon remains several villages which originated as Quilombos, whose “inhabitants managed for generations to pass on the secrets of the rivers and jungle, from which they had been collecting fish, wood, wild fruits, medicinal leaves, and so on” [Reis]. Tragically as the rainforest around them disappears, these tri-racial communities are being systematically exposed and re-colonized. Individuals whose ancestors were bought and sold in the market are finding their own lives bought and sold in the free market. They are also finding new battles to fight: cultural survival, globalization, genocide. They are discovering that they are viewed as pawns in the game played between both leftist and rightist governments where the grand prize is their natural resources. The sugar plantation owner is reincarnated in the CEO. The master’s house is re-established in the hydro-electric dams. Likewise the fierce fighting spirit of their ancestors is being rediscovered, as well. In the late 80’s, when the great-grand-children of slaves were clashing against the government of Suriname, medicine bundles from Africa that had lain buried for 200 years were unearthed and carried into battle [Price].

Slave Rebellions: The Earliest Resistance to Globalization

America. In honor of Amerigo Vespucci, who, upon arriving in South Carolina in 1497, began routine enslavement of the Native Americans to transport back to Spain. Ultimately this was abandoned, “for they chose to die rather than work as slaves” [Sivad]. What is it that causes a person to make that decision? What is it that urges one to fight for absolute freedom; especially when outnumbered and up against superior firepower (advanced technology) and against a mentality that manifests it’s destiny via domestication, enslavement, oppression, rape, and unmatched brutality? Could it be generations of communal, egalitarian upbringings immersed in unadulterated wildness that compelled Indian mothers to suffocate their own newborns rather than have them grow up in bondage? [Sivad] Indians, Africans, and poor whites that did manage to escape returned to help free others. Fugitives, in collaboration with plantation slaves and freed slaves working in urban centers, constantly organized revolts and uprisings throughout history. While acknowledging that slave rebellions “were contemporaneous with the beginning of the slave trade”, Richard Price traces back the first major insurrection to December 26, 1522 in Santo  Domingo [Price]. It is perfectly reasonable to assume that tens of thousands of years earlier, the first attempts made by an individual to exercise authority over other tribal members was met with the same fierce opposition. Maroons engaged in various forms of resistance ranging from property damage: -In 1692 a group of runaway slaves began to plunder farmlands near the town of Camamu. When their Mocambo finally fell their battle cry was, “Death to the whites and long live liberty” [Price]

to direct action:

– In 1876, in the village of Viana runaways came down from a Quilombo and occupied several nearby, demanding the end of slavery [Reis]

to insurgency:

-In the forests and hills on the outskirts of Salvador, the region of Bahia “hid numerous small Quilombos that served as temporary respite for the large urban slave population, which from time to time became involved in slave conspiracies and insurrections.” [Reis]

Interestingly enough, there exists no evidence that slaves ever achieved freedom through signing a petition, participating in letter-writing campaigns, or holding candlelight vigils. Perhaps these illiterate, unlearned savages were wise enough to see the futility of it all. They fully understood the context of their bondage. It was not a condition that could be eradicated through reform. Nothing short of insurrection would suffice.

“One of the most violent of the uprisings occurred in Tado in 1728. The rebels, made up mostly of African-born slaves, but also some Creoles, killed 14 white mine owners and administrators before retreating into the forest. Two of the principal leaders, remained at large…seeking refuge in neighboring free communities” [Romero]. In North America the Seminole were an out-standing Maroon force, due to geographic and political reasons, and were a major impediment on the colonial governments march toward global imperialism. Troop after troop of U.S. soldiers were defeated amidst the swamps and waterways of the Everglades. On September 11, 1812, a train carrying troops under the command of Captain Williams thrust deep into the region known as Florida. Williams was headed to support Colonel Smith whose own battalion was taking a beating. Along the route Seminole sprang forth from bushes, trees, and undergrowth charging the iron beast that stole upon their land, tearing through their mothers’ flesh and belching blackened clouds of slow death into their father’s skies. Inside the belly of this iron beast sat dozens of colonial soldiers, pale and deranged, determined to kill every Seminole brother, rape every sister, burn every village, steal every item, and finally to kidnap every last child (the ones not killed for sport that is) and convert them to the dignified ways of Christianity. The Seminoles had seen these actions before firsthand; indeed it was this psychotic civilized mentality that had originally pushed the Creeks into Florida, passing rows of plantations along the way. They were forced into a corner and, listening to instinct and not pleas for “moral purity,” they lashed out. The train was attacked and routed. A number of invading soldiers perished at the spear point, including Captain Williams himself [Price].

Cultures of Resistance

Over several decades of creating free societies, the Maroon community became an amalgamation of African, European, and Native American cultures. These new cultures, birthed amidst a continuous outlaw environment, became suffused with varying characteristics and traits of fugitive lifestyle. Rebellion and resistence defined every aspect of their life. This tradition continues to the present Maroons in Jamaica today, notes Kenneth Bibly, continue to possess their own religious beliefs, pharmacopeia, oral historical traditions, music, dance, esoteric languages, and other distinct forms of expressive cultures [Bibly].

Perhaps the best description of what characterizes their defiant culture, in this case the Maroon communities throughout the PacificLowlands, is that their music, religion, poetry, etc.  “reflects not a shared sense of past or present subjugation, but rather of past and present autonomy” [Romero]. Immediately following a slaveships arrival,the cargo was quickly divided and separated so as to more effectively exercise control over them. Subjected to such an atrocity as enslavement, a transatlantic voyage covered in urine, feces and vomit, all so one could see their family members dragged away screaming, individuals attempted every method to try to maintain some stable social coherence. Fictitious kinship ties and their associated rituals provided one means of making sense of the world, or at least maintaining spiritual well-being, despite the omnipresence of slavery [Romero].

The extension of family links between both plantation-based and free slaves also served the purpose of solidifying unity “so tight that slaveowners could never break it”[Romero]. These newly-formed ties strengthened the fabric of relationship passed on generation after generation. If our children are to survive in a post-collapse world, egalitarian tribes based upon invented kinship ties need to be established. Then our children can look back upon us as the Maroons of the 1960’s looked upon theirmforebears and, “felt tremendous pride in the accomplishments of their heroic ancestors and, on the whole, remained masters of the forest” [Price]. In Alagoas, Brazil rural poor blacks still celebrate the indomitable Maroon fortress Palmares in folklore through poetry and songs:

Enjoy yourself, Negro

The white man doesn’t come here

And if he does

The devil will carry him off

[Bastide]

Solidarity extended beyond racial and ethnic boundaries to include class-based perspectives of insurgence. During the Balaiada Revolt, slaves joined forces with Brazilian peasants“against an oppressive  and economic order” of both state and national governments, and were aided by bandits and  political dissidents [Schwartz]. Maroon historian Mario Diego Romero divulges an effective argument for analyzing Maroon cultures to further advance ideas for a post-collapse community when he states that the Maroon forms of social organizations, “though sometimes dismissed as chaotic – constitute peaceful enclaves of mutual respect. Certainly they could serve as models for other societies” [Romero].

Allies

The temporary coalitions of oppressed (African/Native/European) were invaluable for the magnitude of armed struggle undertaken and resultant degree of liberation achieved. Equally crucial was the collaboration with the fortunate, privileged individuals within civilized society. Citizens aiding and abetting ex-slaves via food, clothing, or ammunition. They are the towns folk covertly supplying weapons. The merchants secretly re-supplying caches. They are the villagers providing underground shelter. They are the Culture traitors. Near Dover, North Carolina a citizens militia searching for runaways came across a child playing in the woods who confessed that his mother provided food rations for half a dozen runaways daily. After investigating the womyn’s house the militia found additional stores of meat, as well as arms and ammunition for the Maroon insurrectionists [Price]. Also in North Carolina, a 1864 newspaper article mentions the fact that, “white deserters from the Confederate Army were fighting shoulder to shoulder with the self-emancipated Negroes” [Price]. Worth noting here is the story of a particular Ex-Confederate soldier who married a descendant of the Yanga people (the “Black Mexicans”) whose ancestors were rebel slaves that established a Maroon community in Veracruz on the Gulf Coast in 1609. After receiving one too many death threats based on their interracial union, Lucy and Albert Parsons moved to Chicago where they became prominent anarchist organizers. Unquestionably there were thousands of instances where individual residents assisted escapees; clearly there existed entire villages that supported fugitives.

These “free towns” or autonomous zones were built alongside governed ones “with the express purpose of assaulting their structures of domination” [Romero]. During the 18th century in the upper Patia Valley a “Maroon aid society” developed, acting as a passageway to freedom among the Andean mountains. Through associations such as this, it was capable of protecting and absorbing slaves escaping both highland haciendas and lowland mines whose descendants are still found there today practicing small-scale agriculture [Romero]. In his account of the Maroons from the Great Dismal Swamp, James Koehnline ventures to say that, “perhaps, four hundred years ago, these Maroons of four continents held a big pow-wow, dedicating themselves to fight against slavery even then” [Koehnline]. It’s time for another pow-wow; this time dedicated to attacking not just (wage) slavery,but the very source of alienation, domestication, and domination.

Conclusion

In a society where the very air we breathe is polluted, the water we drink is poisoned, and the soil we dig is contaminated there can be few options other than to escape to outside of the ever-expanding suicidal techno-industrial apparatus, and since it must “expand or die” any life forged on the periphery must be nomadic. When our existence is threatened by the very system that is designed to protect us our only hope lies in a life outside that system. Physically, spiritually, and mentally. And as the indigenous populations dealt with the encroachment of the techno-industrial empire of standardization by an organic ebbing and flowing tactic that embraced African slaves and lower class Europeans into a unified fight, they have left us a legacy of resistance. We can honor that legacy by continuing and expanding their struggle. Both inside and outside of civilization.

Bibliography

Bastide, Roger “The Other Quilombos”
Bibly, Kenneth M. “Maroon Autonomy in Jamaica” Cultural Survival Quarterly. Winter 2002
Koenline, James “Legend of the Great Dismal Maroons: Swamp Rats of the World Unite! A Secret History of ‘The Other America’”
Kolhoff, Michael “Fugitive Nation”. Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed. Fall/Winter 2001-2002 Plotkin, Mark “Tales of a Shamans Apprentice”. Bullfrog Video.
Price, Richard (ed.) “Maroon Societies: Rebel Slave Communities in the Americas”
Price, Richard and Sally Price “Maroons Under Assault in Suriname and french Guiana”
Reis, Joao Jose and Flavio dos Santos Gomes “Quilombo: Brazilian Maroons During Slavery”
Romero, Mario Diego and Kris Lane “Miners & Maroons: Freedom on the Pacific Coast of Colombia and Ecuador”
Sakolsky, Ron and James Koehnline (ed.) “Gone to Croatan: Origins of North American Dropout Culture”
Schwartz, Stuart B. “The Mocambo: Slave Resistance in Colonial Bahia”
Sivad, Doug “African Seminoles”

Further Reading

Maroon Societies – Richard Price
Runaway Slaves – John Hope Franklin
Hidden Americans: Maroons of Virginia and Carolina – Hugo Leaming Prosper
Breaking the Chains – William Loren Katz
Africans and Native Americans: The Language of Race and the Evolution of Red-Black Peoples – Jack Forbes
The Mother of Us All: A History of Queen Nanny, Leader of the Windward,Jamaican Maroons – Karla Gottlieb

Audio/Video

Tales of a Shaman’s Apprentice (Bullfrog Films)
Black Indians: An American Story (Rich-Heape Films)
Quilombo (New Yorker Films)
Drums of Defiance: Maroon Music from the Earliest Free Black Communities of Jamaica (Smithsonian/Folkways)

"Anarchists know that a long period of education must precede any great fundamental change in society, hence they do not believe in vote-begging, nor political campaigns, but rather in the development of self-thinking individuals."

Lucy Parsons - The Principles Of Anarchism, 1905

Contact us
fawnarchy@grrlz.net
(Signal) muntjac161.96

"Social" Media

Monthly Newsletter (Via Email)

Buy The Magazine / Donate / Subscribe

Send Us Stuff!
We adore books, zines, love letters, posters, and sweet treats.
But please contact us first...

Muntjac Collective
C/O Freedom Press
84b Whitechapel High St
E1 7QX
London
UK

Protect Yourself
AnarSec
No Trace Project
Tor Project
Tails USB

Counter-Info
Act For Freedom Now!
Unoffensive Animal
Unravel
Sans Nom
Switch off! - The System of Destruction
Squat Radar
A2day
Insendier!
Contra Info
Blessed Is The Flame
Avtonom
La Nemesi
Takku
Informativo Anarquista

Police Monitoring
Copwatch Network
NetPol

Stop Deportations
Anti Raids Network
Migrants' Rights Network

Anti Repression Projects
Bristol Anarchist Black Cross
Brighton Anarchist Black Cross
Incarcerated Workers Organising Committee
Palestine Action Prisoners
Lavender Pages (a solidarity project for LGBTQIA+ prisoners)
NYC Anarchist Black Cross
Support Defendants & Prisoners From the George Floyd Uprisings
Prisoner Solidarity
June 11th - International Day of Solidarity with Marius Mason & All Long-Term Anarchist Prisoners
International Week of Solidarity with Anarchist Prisoners // 23 – 30 August

All our publications are free for prisoners.

  • November 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: micro, developed by DevriX.